
(b)Rule(s) of criminal social function applicable to the issues raised by the state and appellant component 310 (1) of the CPA states as follows: When a lower court has in criminal legal proceeding given a decision in favour of the accuse on any question of law, including an station made under section 85 (2), the attorney-general or, if a body or a person other than the attorney-general or his representative, was the public prosecutor in the proceedings, then such other prosecutor may overtop the judicial officer concerned to state a case for the consideration of the provincial or local persona having jurisdiction, ambit forth the question of law and his decision on it and, if exhibit has been heard, his findings of fact, in so! far as they argon somatic to the question of law. In light of the above, the state exclusively has a right of appeal based on a question of law, and not one of fact, in terms of section 310. The Supreme Court of Appeal took into account the rulings in S v Petro Louise Enterprises (Pty) Ltd and others 1978(1) SA 271 (T), Magmoed v Janse van Rensburg & others 1993(1) SACR 67 (A), and S v Basson 2005(1) SA 171 (CC). (c)...If you desire to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment