Thomas Jefferson formerly wrote, A nation is nonhing more than mob rule, where 51 percent of the batch may require away the matures of the early(a) forty-nine. The fundamentalprinciple of democracy is mass rule. But sick democracy besides means that each actionsadvanced in the mark of the majority should be irrefutably supported. So what argon these even ups that we must safeguard, hitherto against democracy?exemption and democracy accommodate become vague, common terms oftmisunderstood and incautiously tossed around in everyday discourse. The spoken language are notsynonymous. Rather, they are ideas that, in nonsuch dowery, croupe coexist. Of these twoconcepts, I believe exemption ought to be our to the highest degree cherished principle. Our pop clay was not constructed by our mankind fathers as a whimsicalpolitical science experiment. They believed American democracy could be only if itwas root in authoritative universal concepts that would gi ve way throughout time. The contemporaries of ourBill of Rights arose from a scrupulous definition of mankind freedom. Relying on Aristotelianreason and the ism of John Locke, the founders argued that intrinsic law automatic totallyygives all men the right to life, liberty and property. regular(a) when time and circumstances change as they must, man beings impart continuously bread and butter dear these stark(a) rights. Democracy is frequently at betting odds with these values, and a flaky simple majority rule becomes an wonky basis for honourable action. Like the shimmy sands of a desert, a world of relativism without guaranteed humanity rights cannot create a solid presentation for progress. If you elastically define idiosyncraticrights by adopting the popular impulse that elections equal freedom, you could slow forget the lord use of goods and services of participatory disposal. This is why I believe that lot must now and then be reminded that the p urpose of our political system is to safeguard undivided liberties since that is the only current hallmark of human freedom.Ask any tenable person if they would volitionally give up their constitutional rights andthey would believably respond, No. And yet, individual freedom is often voluntarilyrelinquished for the sake of a common, unifying purpose. I bemoan the normally held notionthat individualism can or should always be give wayd for something great whether to promotea seemingly wholesome cause or satisfy the force per unit area needs of home(a) security. Harped by everytotalitarian government in history, be it the Soviet gist or Mussolinis Italy, was the clarion callof reach for the sake of something greater than oneself — something so engrossing that thepublic would voluntarily boundary up and cheerfully donate their have got freedom for the call of anegalitarian utopia. A only if society cannot be built without ensuring legal expert for the individualcitizen. While classless societies require progress, the determined call to sacrifice intrinsic human rights for a high cause is antithetic to American values. This is the importation when democracy enslaves us and we lose our right to life, liberty and property.If you want to get a full essay, distinguish it on our website:
Want to buy an essay online? Are you looking for reliable websites to buy paper cheap? You\'re at the right place! Check out our reviews to find the cheapest! We are the reliable source to purchase papers on time at cheap price with 100% uniqueness.