Integrity in Leadership Essay -- Ethical Integrity Essays

Definition of IntegritySince this cover deals with the idea of lawfulness in leadership, it is dropful to start this paper delineate integrity. Websters dictionary defines integrity as uncompromising adherence to a edict of moral, artistic or other values utter sincerity, honesty and candor, dodging of deception, expediency, or shallowness of any kind Let us tryout this definition a bit deeper. The first spell of the definition talks of uncompromising adherence. This means that one would continuously choose the right path, disregardless of what seems to be more appealing. Take the example of when and when non to lie. A someone of integrity would always regulate the truth regardless of the situation. The second part of the definition deals with what to avoid. Integrity demands comp allowe openness always. The leader of integrity would neer try to knowingly deceive his constituents at any time. The leader would always be open and honest.Theories of Integrity there argon many variant theories of integrity, but this draft leave only discuss ii. The first, Integrity of ego Interests, will deal with integrity as it pertains to a leaders ruff assembly line of action for himself. The second, Integrity of Utility, will deal with integrity as it pertains to the trump naturally for the population.Integrity of Self InterestsIs it better to lie or tell the truth. Trying to analyze this question utilise the theory of self-interests would await upon which excerpt would give the best(p) results for the leader. This is the underlying theme for the theory of self interests. There are two basic formulas that can be used when act to determine what is moral, and they are1.We should choose the action(s) that we feel, with good reason, will benefit us more than any other choice 2.We should choose the action(s) that are in our best interests, or that we favor for the best perceived outcomeThese two formulas can be implemented when making any decision. If you feel something will benefit you, or that you prefer one choice over another, past that choice is a choice of integrity of self interest. To illustrate this better, let us go back to the earlier example of when to lie. By applying every of these two formulas, lying can be considered moral. If lying were either in our best interests or one perceives it to result in the best outcome, than it is ... ...es not have to be a good leader.ConclusionThere are many theories on integrity, but this draft focused on using two, the theories of self-interest and utility. These are the two theories a leader can use when trying to make an ethical decision. The constituents prefer the theory of utility because it ensures the best result for the most people. However the leader may sometimes prefer the theory of self-interests. The only relevance integrity has to leadership, is in choice. If a leader is not felt to have integrity, he is less likely to be chosen as a leader. However once in power, integrity does not really make a difference. Effectiveness does not depend on integrity. As stated earlier, Bill Clinton has been considered one of the most trenchant Presidents in the history of the United States, but he is not considered moral, particularly after the Lewinski scandal came to light. Using the different criteria under the theories of first self-interest, then(prenominal) utility, one could try to answer the question of Clinton?s best course of action. In other words, using the outlined decision making processes, was it the best decision to admit the affair with Monica Lewinski to the public?