Thursday, February 7, 2019

Sexual Selection: Fact or Fiction Essay -- Biology Essays Research Pap

Sexual alternative Fact or manufactureDarwins theory of informal selection is an intriguing one because it offers an explanation of gentleman striving and cultural value systems. The theory is that humans who atomic number 18 more than than sexually desirable will arrive at more offspring and consequently their traits will be passed on to future generations to a greater issue than those of less sexually desirable humans. As opposed to Darwins other theory, essential selection, those who are the best adapted to their environment will be more likely to pass on their genes, or, survival of the fittest, you might call sexual selection survival of the sexiest. The theory is intended to in part relieve why, when humans diverged from other primates, the human brain tripled in size in just two million years. At first glance, this theory withal seems to explain much of the motivation behind human culture and achievement. Upon close-hauled inspection, there are some fairly conspi cuous problems with it, especially when it is all-encompassing to describe non only human evolution in the aloof past but it the present, but it may still be the near plausible explanation available to explain why humans psychogenic capacities have expanded so far beyond those of our primate relatives. It makes unadulterated sense that we would be biologically driven to prove our sexiness. At the intimately basic level, this could explain the plenitude and popularity of fashion magazines for young women and the emphasis on being good at sports in school for both genders. beyond this, it could also explain why men and women are driven to accompany at their various careers, or to be perceived to be successful, smart, witty, fun-loving, good-looking, responsible, or any of a number of things that human aspire to be which are also s... ...corded history. Even if this theory was once true, it does not appear to film true anymore, because those who we consider the most successfu l and desirable are not producing the greatest number of offspring, and so, the traits that are being selected for future generations may be entirely different. Ironically, we may be spending our lives trying to prove we have traits which evolution is actually selecting against. References1) Creativity, Evolution and Mental Illnesses http//jom-emit.cfpm.org/1997/vol1/preti_a&miotto_p.html2) Evolution, Creativity, and ADDhttp//borntoexplore.org/evolve.htm3) Sexual Selection and the intellect A Talk with Geoffrey Miller http//www.edge.org/3rd_culture/miller/miller_p2.html4) The Mating Mind How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature http//www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.008

No comments:

Post a Comment